0.03/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.32	% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
0.12/0.32	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.32	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.32	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.32	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.32	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.32	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 05:49:53 EDT 2024
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.46	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.19/0.50	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.q869Qu0orC/E---3.1_901.p
0.46/0.65	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
0.46/0.65	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSMNHSA.
0.46/0.65	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh1 with 900s (5) cores
0.46/0.65	# Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# Starting new_ho_11 with 180s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# sh1 with pid 995 completed with status 0
0.46/0.65	# Result found by sh1
0.46/0.65	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSMNHSA.
0.46/0.65	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh1 with 900s (5) cores
0.46/0.65	# No SInE strategy applied
0.46/0.65	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFFBN
0.46/0.65	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh3 with 487s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh1 with 91s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 82s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# Starting pre_casc_5 with 82s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh3l with 82s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# sh1 with pid 1003 completed with status 0
0.46/0.65	# Result found by sh1
0.46/0.65	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSMNHSA.
0.46/0.65	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh1 with 900s (5) cores
0.46/0.65	# No SInE strategy applied
0.46/0.65	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHSFFFBN
0.46/0.65	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh3 with 487s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# Starting sh1 with 91s (1) cores
0.46/0.65	# Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
0.46/0.65	
0.46/0.65	# Proof found!
0.46/0.65	# SZS status Theorem
0.46/0.65	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_sort1, type, product_prod_nat_nat: $tType).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_sort2, type, capacity: $tType).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_sort3, type, list_P559422087at_nat: $tType).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_sort4, type, nat: $tType).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_sort5, type, set_Pr1986765409at_nat: $tType).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_24, type, augmen1090971539pacity: (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > nat > nat > (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > list_P559422087at_nat > $o).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_28, type, isSimp1359852763pacity: (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > nat > list_P559422087at_nat > nat > $o).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_32, type, inf_in586391887at_nat: set_Pr1986765409at_nat > set_Pr1986765409at_nat > set_Pr1986765409at_nat).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_33, type, set_Pr2131844118at_nat: list_P559422087at_nat > set_Pr1986765409at_nat).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_51, type, bot_bo2130386637at_nat: set_Pr1986765409at_nat).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_60, type, converse_nat_nat: set_Pr1986765409at_nat > set_Pr1986765409at_nat).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_64, type, residu203630698pacity: (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > (product_prod_nat_nat > capacity) > product_prod_nat_nat > capacity).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_69, type, c: product_prod_nat_nat > capacity).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_70, type, f: product_prod_nat_nat > capacity).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_71, type, p: list_P559422087at_nat).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_72, type, s: nat).
0.46/0.65	thf(decl_73, type, t: nat).
0.46/0.65	thf(conj_1, conjecture, ((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.q869Qu0orC/E---3.1_901.p', conj_1)).
0.46/0.65	thf(fact_57_Graph_OisSPath__nt__parallel__pf, axiom, ![X182:product_prod_nat_nat > capacity, X12:nat, X17:list_P559422087at_nat, X13:nat]:(((isSimp1359852763pacity @ X182 @ X12 @ X17 @ X13)=>((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X17) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X17)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.q869Qu0orC/E---3.1_901.p', fact_57_Graph_OisSPath__nt__parallel__pf)).
0.46/0.65	thf(fact_5_isAugmentingPath__def, axiom, ![X17:list_P559422087at_nat]:(((augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X17)<=>(isSimp1359852763pacity @ (residu203630698pacity @ c @ f) @ s @ X17 @ t))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.q869Qu0orC/E---3.1_901.p', fact_5_isAugmentingPath__def)).
0.46/0.65	thf(conj_0, hypothesis, (augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ p), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.q869Qu0orC/E---3.1_901.p', conj_0)).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p)))!=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1])])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1554:product_prod_nat_nat > capacity, X1555:nat, X1556:list_P559422087at_nat, X1557:nat]:((~(isSimp1359852763pacity @ X1554 @ X1555 @ X1556 @ X1557)|((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X1556) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X1556)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_57_Graph_OisSPath__nt__parallel__pf])])])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X1969:list_P559422087at_nat]:(((~(augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X1969)|(isSimp1359852763pacity @ (residu203630698pacity @ c @ f) @ s @ X1969 @ t))&(~(isSimp1359852763pacity @ (residu203630698pacity @ c @ f) @ s @ X1969 @ t)|(augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X1969)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_5_isAugmentingPath__def])])])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p)))!=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X9:product_prod_nat_nat > capacity, X12:nat, X17:list_P559422087at_nat, X13:nat]:((((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X17) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X17)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat))|~((isSimp1359852763pacity @ X9 @ X12 @ X17 @ X13)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X17:list_P559422087at_nat]:(((isSimp1359852763pacity @ (residu203630698pacity @ c @ f) @ s @ X17 @ t)|~((augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X17)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ p)))!=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X17:list_P559422087at_nat]:((((inf_in586391887at_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X17) @ (converse_nat_nat @ (set_Pr2131844118at_nat @ X17)))=(bot_bo2130386637at_nat))|~((augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ X17)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_12, hypothesis, (augmen1090971539pacity @ c @ s @ t @ f @ p), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0])).
0.46/0.65	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12])]), ['proof']).
0.46/0.65	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.46/0.65	# Parsed axioms                        : 338
0.46/0.65	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.46/0.65	# Initial clauses                      : 524
0.46/0.65	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 81
0.46/0.65	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 443
0.46/0.65	# Processed clauses                    : 689
0.46/0.65	# ...of these trivial                  : 28
0.46/0.65	# ...subsumed                          : 269
0.46/0.65	# ...remaining for further processing  : 392
0.46/0.65	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 86
0.46/0.65	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.46/0.65	# Backward-subsumed                    : 22
0.46/0.65	# Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.46/0.65	# Generated clauses                    : 2074
0.46/0.65	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1646
0.46/0.65	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.46/0.65	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
0.46/0.65	# Paramodulations                      : 1758
0.46/0.65	# Factorizations                       : 8
0.46/0.65	# NegExts                              : 13
0.46/0.65	# Equation resolutions                 : 100
0.46/0.65	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.46/0.65	# Total rewrite steps                  : 655
0.46/0.65	# ...of those cached                   : 501
0.46/0.65	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.46/0.65	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.46/0.65	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.46/0.65	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.46/0.65	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.46/0.65	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.46/0.65	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.46/0.65	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.46/0.65	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.46/0.65	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.46/0.65	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.46/0.65	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.46/0.65	# Current number of processed clauses  : 336
0.46/0.65	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 55
0.46/0.65	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
0.46/0.65	#    Negative unit clauses             : 14
0.46/0.65	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 265
0.46/0.65	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1345
0.46/0.65	# ...number of literals in the above   : 4341
0.46/0.65	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.46/0.65	# Current number of archived clauses   : 33
0.46/0.65	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19226
0.46/0.65	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10972
0.46/0.65	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 238
0.46/0.65	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 925
0.46/0.65	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.46/0.65	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 77
0.46/0.65	# BW rewrite match successes           : 13
0.46/0.65	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.46/0.65	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.46/0.65	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 59918
0.46/0.65	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 9651
0.46/0.65	
0.46/0.65	# -------------------------------------------------
0.46/0.65	# User time                : 0.113 s
0.46/0.65	# System time              : 0.008 s
0.46/0.65	# Total time               : 0.121 s
0.46/0.65	# Maximum resident set size: 4480 pages
0.46/0.65	
0.46/0.65	# -------------------------------------------------
0.46/0.65	# User time                : 0.457 s
0.46/0.65	# System time              : 0.035 s
0.46/0.65	# Total time               : 0.492 s
0.46/0.65	# Maximum resident set size: 2368 pages
0.46/0.65	% E---3.1 exiting
0.46/0.65	% E exiting
0.46/0.65	EOF